Answer first
This page answers the question behind What should users know about ETENWOLF HB2 PUMP 2 REACH SVHC Test Report – 250 Substances Compliance Verified? using the exported M2 source record. The short answer is: This page presents the official REACH SVHC test report issued for the HB2 inflation pump. The report was prepared by Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. , an accredited third-party testing laboratory, and carries report number WTH25X07201673X1C . The statement applies to the model, document scope, sample, and conditions described in the source; it is not a blanket claim about every ETENWOLF product or every later production revision.
Scope and document identity
The source record is titled ETENWOLF HB2 PUMP 2 REACH SVHC Test Report – 250 Substances Compliance Verified. It is treated here as technical evidence, not as a replacement for the original report, manual, certificate, safety data sheet, or declaration required by a destination market. Start any support or compliance answer by matching the exact model, document number, revision, and date.
What a reader should verify
- Confirm the product model and hardware or material configuration.
- Locate the original source document and check its issue date and laboratory or author.
- Read the stated method, threshold, operating condition, or warning before interpreting a result.
- Separate evidence about EMC, chemicals, battery safety, transport, operation, and measurement accuracy.
Detailed evidence from the source record
The cleaned evidence below preserves the source document’s useful headings, paragraphs, lists, and tables so a human BasePress editor can publish searchable HTML while retaining traceability.
Document Overview
This page presents the official REACH SVHC test report issued for the HB2 inflation pump. The report was prepared by Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., an accredited third-party testing laboratory, and carries report number WTH25X07201673X1C.
The document was issued under European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), specifically to evaluate the presence of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) in the submitted product sample. The scope covers the full candidate list published on the ECHA Candidate List, comprising 250 confirmed SVHC substances and 2 potential substances at the time of testing.
- Report Number: WTH25X07201673X1C
- Document Type: REACH SVHC Test Report
- Issuing Body: Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
- Date of Issue: 2025-08-19
- Testing Period: 2025-07-29 to 2025-08-12
- Date of Sample Receipt: 2025-07-29
- Regulatory Framework: EC Regulation 1907/2006 (REACH)
Product Information
The sample submitted for REACH SVHC evaluation is described below. The product is marketed under the ETENWOLF brand and distributed globally as a portable inflation tool.
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Sample Name | PUMP 2 |
| Model Number | HB2 |
| Reference Model Number | NA |
| Brand | NA (distributed under ETENWOLF) |
| Applicant | Guangdong Bestek Technology Co., LTD |
| Applicant Address | No.1, North Gaopu 8th Road, Yuancheng Industrial Park, Heyuan City, Guangdong, P.R. China |
| Manufacturer | Guangdong Bestek Technology Co., LTD |
| Manufacturer Address | No.1, North Gaopu 8th Road, Yuancheng Industrial Park, Heyuan City, Guangdong, P.R. China |
The HB2 is a compact portable pump designed for inflation applications. The sample was physically received by the laboratory on 2025-07-29 and photographed as part of the testing intake procedure, with additional photos recorded on 2025-08-14.
Key Details
The central objective of this test report is to determine whether the HB2 pump contains any of the substances listed on the ECHA SVHC Candidate List at a concentration equal to or exceeding the threshold of 0.1% by weight (w/w). This threshold is defined under Article 59 of REACH Regulation EC 1907/2006.
Test Conclusion
According to the specified analytical scope and test methods applied, the concentrations of all 250 SVHC substances and 2 potential substances evaluated under Group T01 are less than 0.1% (w/w) in the submitted samples. The product therefore meets REACH SVHC compliance requirements as of the date of testing.
| Group | Substances Evaluated | Result (%, w/w) | Reporting Limit (%, w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T01 | 250 SVHC substances + 2 potential substances from ECHA Candidate List | < 0.1% for all substances | 0.1% |
SVHC Candidate List Reference
The full and current ECHA Candidate List is maintained at: https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-table. The list evaluated in this report reflects the version current as of the testing period (July–August 2025), totaling 250 confirmed SVHC substances and 2 candidate substances under consideration.
Standards & Compliance
Testing was conducted using a combination of in-house methods and internationally recognised reference standards. All analytical techniques are traceable to the following published methods:
| Standard / Method | Scope |
|---|---|
| EPA 3550C:2007 | Ultrasonic extraction for semi-volatile organic compounds |
| US EPA 8270D:2018 | GC/MS analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds |
| US EPA 3052:1996 | Microwave-assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices |
| US EPA 3050B:1996 | Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils |
| US EPA 6010D:2018 | Inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) |
| BS EN ISO 14362-1:2017 | Determination of aromatic amines derived from azo colorants – Part 1 |
| BS EN ISO 14362-3:2017 | Determination of aromatic amines derived from azo colorants – Part 3 |
| ISO 17234-1:2020 | Chemical tests for the determination of certain azo colorants in leather dyes – Part 1 |
| ISO 17234-2:2011 | Chemical tests for the determination of certain azo colorants in leather dyes – Part 2 |
| ISO 17353:2004 | Water quality – determination of selected organotin compounds |
| AfPS GS 2019:01 PAK | Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in consumer products |
The regulatory basis for this compliance assessment is European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), specifically the obligations relating to articles containing SVHC substances above 0.1% w/w as defined in Article 7(2) and Article 59.
Validity & Certification Body
This test report was prepared and signed by Hugo Chen on behalf of Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a recognised third-party testing and certification organisation operating from Shenzhen, China.
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Report Number | WTH25X07201673X1C |
| Date of Issue | 2025-08-19 |
| Testing Period | 2025-07-29 to 2025-08-12 |
| Sample Receipt Date | 2025-07-29 |
| Signed By | Hugo Chen, Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
| Laboratory Name | Waltek Testing Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
| Laboratory Address | 1/F., Room 101, Building 1, Hongwei Industrial Park, Liuxian 2nd Road, Block 70, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China |
| Laboratory Website | http://www.waltek.com.cn |
| Telephone | +86-755-33663308 |
| Fax | +86-755-33663309 |
| [email protected] | |
| Report Total Pages | 28 |
How to interpret the answer
A technical document answers a bounded question. A positive test result means the submitted sample met the named requirement under the recorded method; it does not automatically establish legal market access, lifetime reliability, safe use in every environment, or equivalence to an untested revision. When a question goes beyond the source scope, say that the detail is not documented here and request the applicable companion evidence.
What this document does not prove
This rewrite does not create a new certification, warranty, regulatory filing, or product specification. It does not prove that a different model, supplier, battery cell, firmware build, or bill of materials has the same result. It also does not replace the model-specific user manual or advice from a qualified compliance, transport, or safety professional.
Practical review checklist
| Review item | Question to answer before relying on the page |
|---|---|
| Identity | Does the label and shipped configuration match the source sample? |
| Evidence | Can the report, workbook, manual, or MSDS be retrieved from the source notes? |
| Scope | Is the claim limited to the named method, threshold, date, and sample? |
| Change control | Have materials, suppliers, firmware, battery cells, or construction changed? |
| Human action | Has an editor checked the original document before publishing? |
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this page apply to every version of the product?
No. Use it for the exact model and configuration documented in ETENWOLF HB2 PUMP 2 REACH SVHC Test Report – 250 Substances Compliance Verified; later revisions require a documented equivalence review.
Can this result be used as a general safety or legal guarantee?
No. The result is evidence for a bounded technical scope. Other requirements may need separate EMC, chemical, battery, transport, or operating documents.
What if the question asks for a value that is not shown?
Do not infer it. State that the value is not documented in this source record and request the original evidence or a qualified review.
Why keep the original document after publishing?
Because the published rewrite is an explanation. The original report or manual remains the authoritative record for traceability, audits, customer support, and change control.
